Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 2024 Jan 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends surgical resection for stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Despite these recommendations and the curative potential of such surgery, many continue to underutilize surgery. Our aim is to investigate factors that contribute to underutilization of surgery for stage I SCLC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with SCLC stage I-IV from 2004 to 2018. Staging was defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines. Cochran-Armitage analysis was performed to analyze trends in surgical treatment for patients diagnosed with stage I SCLC. Multivariable logistic regression assessed relationships between patient factors and surgical treatment. RESULTS: A total of 296,583 patients were diagnosed with SCLC. Of the stage I patients (n = 13,003), only 29.4.% (n = 3823) underwent surgery. Trend analysis demonstrated increased frequency of surgical treatment for stage I SCLC over years 2004 to 2017, from 14.9% to 39.6% (P < .0001). Factors that were associated with underutilization of surgery for stage I SCLC include African American race, lower median income, nonprivate insurance or Medicare, community facility, and geographic regions other than the Northeast. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for stage I SCLC remains underutilized and our study identifies notable associated factors. The recognition of these factors may help patients overcome barriers to receiving recommended treatments, improve guideline adherence, and overall quality of care for stage I SCLC patients.

4.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 23(9): 113, 2021 07 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269860

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the present review, we discuss the role of CT imaging in the management of aortic dissection, with a particular emphasis on endovascular treatment considerations. RECENT FINDINGS: Computed tomography imaging is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic aortic dissection. Its diagnostic accuracy and high resolution contribute to and guide operative strategy. Persistent high mortality for patients who develop aortic dissections suggests a need for innovative diagnostic and treatment strategies. In the recent era, considerable advances have been made in computed tomography (CT) image acquisition, processing, and analysis as well as endovascular technologies with expanded roles in the treatment of aortic diseases.


Assuntos
Doenças da Aorta , Dissecção Aórtica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Transplant Proc ; 53(1): 353-357, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32650992

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are generally used short term to maintain adequate organ perfusion in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Unacceptably high waitlist mortality in this cohort motivated changes to heart allocation policy, which recognized the severity of illness by prioritization for temporary MCS and broader sharing in the new U.S. donor heart allocation policy. We evaluated the post-heart transplant outcomes for patients bridged with temporary MCS, a control population not bridged with MCS, and a cohort bridged with durable MCS. METHODS: The heart transplant research database was queried to identify patients bridged with temporary MCS and bridged with durable MCS who went directly to heart transplant in our center. Temporary MCS included Impella, intra-aortic balloon pump, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Post-transplant endpoints were assessed at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, a total of 23 patients were bridged to heart transplant with temporary MCS and 548 were transplanted without MCS bridge. Patients bridged with temporary MCS had younger age, lower body mass index, and higher frequencies of prior blood transfusion and Status 1 (1A/1B) listing at transplant compared to patients not bridged with MCS (all P < .001). Despite the severity of illness in patients bridged with temporary MCS, post-transplant outcomes were indistinguishable from those in patients transplanted without MCS bridge, with no difference in 30-day, 6-month, or 1-year survival or 1-year freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, any-treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, or antibody-mediated rejection (P = .23-.97). Similarly, compared to 157 patients bridged with durable MCS, no differences in post-transplant outcomes were identified for the temporary MCS cohort (P = .15-.94). CONCLUSION: Temporary MCS as a bridge to transplant achieves similar post-transplant outcomes at 1 year compared to no MCS and durable MCS. These encouraging findings support recent changes in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network | United Network Organ Sharing (OPTN|UNOS) adult heart allocation policy.


Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Seleção de Pacientes , Políticas , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidade , Feminino , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Listas de Espera/mortalidade
8.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 112(2): 645-651, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011166

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mentoring is an essential component of cardiothoracic surgery training, yet trainees report varied experiences despite substantial efforts to enhance mentorship opportunities. This study aimed to evaluate mentorship effectiveness and identify gaps in mentorship education. METHODS: A survey was distributed to cardiothoracic surgical trainees in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs (n = 531). Responses to 16 questions concerning trainee experiences, expectations, and perspectives on mentorship were collected. An 11-component mentorship effectiveness tool generated a composite score (0 to 55), with a score of 44 or lower indicating less effective mentorship. RESULTS: Sixty-seven residents completed the survey (12.6%), with most (83.6%) reporting a current mentor. Trainees with mentors cited "easy to work with and approachable" (44 of 58; 75.9%) as the major criterion for mentor selection, whereas trainees without a mentor reported an inability to identify one who truly reflected the resident's needs (6 of 11; 45.5%). Resident age, gender, race or ethnicity, marital status, family status, postgraduate year, and training program type or size were not associated with having a mentor (P = .15 to .73). The median mentorship effectiveness score was 51 (interquartile range, 44, 55). More than one-third of residents (25 of 67) had either no mentor (n = 6) or less effective mentorship (n = 16), or both (n = 3). Resident and program characteristics were not associated with mentorship effectiveness (P = .39 to .99). Finally, 61.2% of residents had not received education on effective mentorship, and 53.8% did not currently serve as a mentor. CONCLUSIONS: Many resident respondents have either no mentor or less effective mentorship, and most reported not having received education on mentorship. Addressing these gaps in mentorship training and delivery should be prioritized.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Tutoria/métodos , Mentores/estatística & dados numéricos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 46(2): 115-119, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236075

RESUMO

Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of cardiovascular death. Historically, surgical intervention has been associated with high morbidity rates. Pharmacologic therapy alone can be inadequate for patients with substantial hemodynamic compromise, so minimally invasive procedures are being developed to reduce clot burden. We describe our initial experience with using the AngioVac system to remove thromboemboli percutaneously. We reviewed all suction thromboembolectomy procedures performed at our institution from March 2013 through August 2015. The main indications for the procedure were failed catheter-directed therapy, contraindication to thrombolysis, bleeding-related complications, and clot-in-transit phenomena. We collected details on patient characteristics, procedural indications, thrombus location, hemodynamic values, cardiac function, pharmacologic support, and survival to discharge from the hospital. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. Thirteen patients (mean age, 56 ± 15 yr; 10 men) underwent suction thromboembolectomy; 10 (77%) survived to hospital discharge. The median follow-up time was 74 days (interquartile range [IQR], 23-221 d). Preprocedurally, 8 patients (62%) had severe right ventricular dysfunction; afterwards, 11 (85%) had normal function or mild-to-moderate dysfunction, and only 2 (17%) had severe dysfunction (P=0.031). Percutaneous suction thromboembolectomy, a promising therapeutic option for patients, appears to be safe, and we found it to be associated with improved right ventricular function.


Assuntos
Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Artéria Pulmonar/cirurgia , Embolia Pulmonar/cirurgia , Trombectomia/métodos , Função Ventricular Direita/fisiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sucção/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 28(1): 45-51, 2019 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29982486

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Combined heart-kidney transplantation has successful outcomes. With an increasing number of patients with end-stage heart disease, there is a high incidence of significant renal insufficiency that may necessitate combined heart-kidney transplant. Outcomes for heart-kidney transplant recipients aged ≥65 years are not well described. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2015, 163 recipients ≥65 years of age were transplanted in a single centre: 12 heart-kidney and 151 isolated heart transplants. Outcomes assessed were estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1, 6 and 12 months after transplant, the need for dialysis, 1-year survival, 1-year freedom from rejection, 1-year freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy and 1-year freedom from non-fatal major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: Recipient ages were 67.8 ± 1.6 and 69.0 ± 2.8 years for heart-kidney transplant and isolated heart transplant, and pretransplant estimated glomerular filtration rates were 26.6 ± 9.4 vs 55.2 ± 18.9, respectively. At 1 month (66.3 ± 31.4 vs 67.2 ± 28.0, P = 0.92), 6 months (68.1 ± 21.3 vs 60.5 ± 19.6, P = 0.20) and 12 months (58.6 ± 21.5 vs 52.4 ± 18.5, P = 0.27) post-transplant, estimated glomerular filtration rate was similar for heart-kidney transplant versus isolated heart transplant. There was a trend towards reduced 1-year freedom from temporary dialysis after heart-kidney transplant relative to isolated heart transplant (75.0% vs 90.4%, P = 0.06) without a difference in 1-year freedom from chronic dialysis (100% vs 95.2%, P = 0.46). There were no differences in 1-year survival, 1-year freedom from any treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy and non-fatal major adverse cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: For patients ≥65 years old, heart-kidney transplant can achieve outcomes on par with heart transplant alone.


Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Transplante de Coração/métodos , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Transplantados , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
ASAIO J ; 64(5): e80-e87, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29538018

RESUMO

The use of stem cell therapy in combination with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for patients with advanced heart failure (HF) is an attractive concept with the potential to alter the natural history of HF. Cell therapy trials for HF have demonstrated excellent safety and encouraging results, but current rates of myocardial recovery after LVAD implantation are limited. Early trials combining these 2 therapies to increase the likelihood of recovery and to potentially obviate the need for subsequent transplantation appear promising. Additionally, the application of cell therapy to patients undergoing LVAD implantation as a bridge to cardiac transplantation creates an opportunity to examine cardiac tissue before and after treatment and to study the mechanism of benefit. Despite the promise, there is a paucity of data for the combination of stem cell therapy with LVAD insertion in patients with HF. Of 11 case series or clinical trials, the largest enrolled 30 patients. We highlight clinical trials using stem cell therapy for end-stage HF most relevant to an LVAD patient population and comprehensively review the preclinical and clinical studies of combined stem cell therapy and long-term mechanical circulatory support. Based on the available clinical trials, the combination of stem cell therapy and LVAD support is a promising approach but requires further clinical refinement, with additional clinical data and larger numbers of patients required to support its clinical application.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Coração Auxiliar , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Terapia Combinada , Humanos
15.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 45(1): 17-22, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29556146

RESUMO

Using older donor hearts in cardiac transplantation may lead to inferior outcomes: older donors have more comorbidities that reduce graft quality, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Shorter cold ischemic times might overcome the detrimental effect of older donor age. We examined the relationship between donor allograft age and cold ischemic time on the long-term outcomes of heart transplant recipients. rom 1994 through 2010, surgeons at our hospital performed 745 heart transplantations. We retrospectively classified these cases by donor ages of <50 years (younger) and ≥50 years (older), then by cold ischemic times of <120 min (short), 120 to 240 min (intermediate), and >240 min (long). Endpoints included recipient and graft survival, and freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, and rejection. For intermediate ischemic times, the 5-year recipient survival rate was lower when donors were older (70% vs 82.6%; P=0.02). This was also true for long ischemic times (69.8% vs 87.6%; P=0.09). For short ischemic times, we found no difference in 5-year recipient or graft survival rates (80% older vs 85.6% younger; P=0.79), in freedom from nonfatal major adverse cardiac events (83.3% vs 91.5%; P=0.46), or in freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (50% vs 70.6%; P=0.66). Rejection rates were mostly similar. Long-term graft survival in heart transplantation patients with older donor allografts may improve when cold ischemic times are shorter.


Assuntos
Isquemia Fria/métodos , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Cardiopatias/cirurgia , Transplante de Coração/métodos , Doadores de Tecidos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 36(3): 258-263, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27646064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Organ Care System, an ex-vivo heart perfusion platform, represents an alternative to the current standard of cold organ storage that sustains the donor heart in a near-physiologic state. It is unknown whether using the Organ Care System influences 2-year outcomes after heart transplantation. We reviewed our institutional experience to compare 2-year outcomes for patients randomized to the Organ Care System or standard cold storage. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, heart transplant candidates from a single tertiary-care medical center enrolled within the PROCEED II trial were randomized to either standard cold storage or the Organ Care System. Outcomes assessed included 2-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), non-fatal major cardiac events (NF-MACE), biopsy-proven cellular rejection (CMR) and biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized to the Organ Care System (n = 19) or cold storage group (n = 19). There was no significant difference in 2-year patient survival (Organ Care System: 72.2%; cold storage: 81.6%; p = 0.38). Similarly, there were no differences in freedom from CAV, NF-MACE, CMR or AMR. The Organ Care System group had significantly longer total ischemia time (361 ± 96 minutes vs 207 ± 50 minutes; p < 0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (134 ± 45 minutes vs 207 ± 50 minutes; p < 0.001) compared with the cold storage group. CONCLUSION: The Organ Care System did not appear to be associated with significant differences in intermediate results compared with conventional strategies. These results suggest that this ex-vivo allograft perfusion system is a promising and valid platform for donor heart transportation.


Assuntos
Criopreservação/métodos , Circulação Extracorpórea/métodos , Transplante de Coração/métodos , Preservação de Órgãos/métodos , Perfusão/instrumentação , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Circulação Extracorpórea/instrumentação , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Análise de Sobrevida , Doadores de Tecidos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 35(11): 1348-1357, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342903

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A single dose of allogeneic cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) improves cardiac function and reduces scarring, and increases viable myocardium in the infarcted rat and pig heart without eliciting a detrimental immune response. Clinical trials using single doses of allogeneic human CDCs are underway. It is unknown whether repeat dosing confers additional benefit or if it elicits an immune response. METHODS: Wistar-Kyoto rats underwent coronary artery ligation and intramyocardial injection of CDCs, with a second thoracotomy and repeat CDC injection 3 weeks later. Treatment permutations included 2 doses of allogeneic Brown-Norway CDCs (n = 24), syngeneic Wistar-Kyoto CDCs (n = 24), xenogeneic human CDCs (n = 24) or saline (n = 8). Cardiac function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, infarct size and inflammatory infiltration by histology, and cellular and humoral immune responses by lymphocyte proliferation and alloantibody assays. RESULTS: Repeat dosing of allogeneic and syngeneic CDCs improved ejection fraction by 5.2% (95% CI 2.1 to 8.3) and 6.8% (95% CI 3.8 to 9.8) after the first dose, and by 3.4% (95% CI 0.1% to 6.8%) and 6.4% (95% CI 4.2% to 8.6%) after the second dose. Infarct size was equally reduced with repeat dosing of syngeneic and allogeneic CDCs relative to xenogeneic and control treatments (p < 0.0001). Significant rejection-like infiltrates were present only in the xenogeneic group; likewise, lymphocyte proliferation and antibody assays were positive in the xenogeneic and negative in syngeneic and allogeneic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat dosing of allogeneic CDCs in immunocompetent rats is safe and effective, consistent with the known immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of CDCs. These findings motivate clinical testing of repeatedly dosed CDCs for chronic heart disease.


Assuntos
Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos/métodos , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Imunização/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Miócitos Cardíacos/transplante , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Remodelação Ventricular , Animais , Células Cultivadas , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/patologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Miócitos Cardíacos/citologia , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos BN , Ratos Endogâmicos WKY , Medicina Regenerativa/métodos , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia
18.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 42(6): 572-4, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26664315

RESUMO

Evolving technology and improvements in the design of modern, continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices have substantially reduced the rate of device malfunction. As the number of implanted devices increases and as survival prospects for patients with a device continue to improve, device malfunction is an increasingly common clinical challenge. Here, we present our initial experience with an endovascular microaxial flow left ventricular assist device as a successful bridge to transplantation in a 54-year-old man who experienced left ventricular assist device malfunction.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Falha de Prótese , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Listas de Espera
19.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 25(12): 999-1004, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26523797

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Technologic advances and superior survival with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) have led to an expanding population that develops intraabdominal conditions requiring intervention. Whether laparoscopy can be performed without detrimental effects on hemodynamics and device function is not well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects of laparoscopy performed on MCS were retrospectively assessed. Intraoperative hemodynamics and device function were compared with the same time interval 24 hours prior to surgery using intrapatient paired t tests. Outcomes included survival, transfusion, thromboembolic events, and infection. RESULTS: Twelve patients with ventricular assist devices or total artificial hearts underwent laparoscopy from 2012 to 2014. Median follow-up was 116 days. Operations included cholecystectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, gastrojejunostomy, and gastrostomy. There were no differences between preoperative and intraoperative mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and inotrope or vasopressor requirements (P > .05). Device fill volume, flow, rate, and power were unchanged (P > .05), whereas pulsatility index decreased by 0.2 (95% confidence interval, 0.03, 0.36) with laparoscopy (P = .03). All intraoperative fluctuations in hemodynamics and device function improved with reduction of pneumoperitoneum, adjusting device speed, or pharmacologic support. There were no operative mortalities. Thirty-day survival and survival to discharge were 75% and 50%, respectively. Despite antiplatelet therapy and preoperative international normalization ratio of 2.2 ± 0.9, there were no re-operations for bleeding, and 50% did not require transfusion. Two patients with recent cardiac surgery had thromboembolic events: one stroke and one device thrombus. None had postoperative bacteremia or driveline infection. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy can be performed on MCS with low morbidity and mortality and minimal perturbations in hemodynamics and device function.


Assuntos
Coração Auxiliar , Hemodinâmica , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
Am Surg ; 81(10): 1047-52, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26463306

RESUMO

Poor outcomes after thoracic transplantation with concurrent renal dysfunction are well described: without transplantation or with thoracic-only transplantation, patients face unacceptably high mortality. Outcomes after combined lung-kidney transplantation (LKT) remain largely uninvestigated. The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was queried to identify all LKTs, lung transplantations (LTs), and kidney transplantations (KTs) performed in the United States from 1995 to 2013. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests or Cox regression models. Thirty-one LKTs were performed. Mean recipient age was 45.4 ± 13.5 years; 48.3 per cent were male. Retransplantation for graft failure was the leading indication for LT (n = 13) and the most common renal indication was calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity (n = 11). Mean lung allocation score was 46.6 ± 14.4, mean creatinine was 3.7 ± 2.8 g/dL, and glomerular filtration rate was 23.1 (interquartile range 11.9, 38.3) mL/min/1.7 m(2), and 11 (35.5%) were dialysis dependent. Patient survival after LKT was 92.9 per cent, 71.0 per cent, and 71.0 per cent at one month, six months, and one year, with a median survival of 95.2 months. One- and five-year survival after LKT, 71.0 per cent and 59.9 per cent, were similar to LT (n = 23,913), 81.7 per cent and 51.4 per cent (P = 0.061 and 0.55), and inferior to KT (n = 175,269), 94.9 per cent and 82.8 per cent (P < 0.0001), respectively. Patient survival after LKT was similar to isolated LT, and these results suggest that LKT is a feasible therapeutic option for LT candidates with significant renal dysfunction.


Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Transplante de Pulmão/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/cirurgia , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...